Article Directory :: Politics & Government Articles

Will Obama and the media throw ACORN under the bus?

By Drew McKissick

Subscribe to Drew McKissick's RSS feed using any feed reader!

Republish: EasyPublish
Published: 04Oct2009
Word count: 779
Viewed: 128 time(s)
Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager!
Get Free Content For Your Site

As the most recent scandal surrounding ACORN grows, it begs the question of "will they or won't they?" As in, will Barack Obama and the mainstream media decide that it's in their best interest to "throw ACORN under the bus"?

Things haven't been going so well for either of them lately, and the ACORN scandal presents them with an opportunity to try and gain a little credibility.

The "mainstream" media continues to take a beating with steadily declining readers and viewers, and many media companies are in (or on the verge of) bankruptcy all over the country.

They have allowed themselves to become so invested in certain groups and politicians that they have forgotten their jobs - that thing they are supposed to do to attract readers and viewers and earn money - and now they are going down the tubes.

Obama's in a similar situation. After taking office in what seemed like a coronation, accompanied by high public approval ratings, he has spent much of his time pushing policies that many who supported him have found to have little resemblance to the "hope and change" they thought they voted for. As a result, his numbers have been heading south. Fast.

A recent Gallup poll confirmed his slide in public approval as the third largest and fastest drop in presidential polling history. Currently only half of the country approves of the job he's doing.

And now along comes ACORN, with pimps, prostitutes and fraud - all caught on hidden camera.

What's so bad is that this is what it took to bring ACORN the attention is so richly deserves.

A report compiled by Republicans on the House Oversight Committee demonstrated plenty of reasons to look into ACORN. It found cases of tax evasion, obstruction of justice, investment fraud, defrauding government by using taxpayer dollars for partisan activities, submitting false information to the US Department of Labor and the IRS, and even violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. This is in addition to dozens of investigations (and many convictions) for voter fraud.

But if it's not on video, it doesn't seem to matter.

To make things even more frustrating, we're talking about an organization that has received over fifty million dollars in federal tax dollars since 1994 and, thanks to the "stimulus bill", they're eligible for over eight billion more. And yes, that's billion with a "b".

Some have already been shamed into action.

In the past week, the Inspector General of the Justice Department announced that his office will begin an investigation into any misuse of grant money from that department. And the House and Senate have each passed differing versions of amendments to de-fund some or all of ACORN, but it still must pass both houses and then be signed into law by Obama.

For the media's part, even after the videos were there for everyone to see they paid only scant attention to the issue. A week after the first video hit, ABC News Anchor Charlie Gibson stated in a radio interview that "I didn't even know about it".

As for Obama, he told ABC's George Stephanopoulos that "it's not really something I've followed closely. I didn't even know that ACORN was getting a whole lot of federal money." Uh-huh.

If either Obama or the media want to attempt to salvage any credibility, they have to act. Sooner or later their instincts for personal gain have to kick in and they'll see that they have to throw ACORN under the bus.

It's not as though they've never done it before, as countless of their friends, grandmothers and former pastors could testify.

The media should do what they used to do well. Report. There are plenty of other ACORN offices around the country engaged in other activity which is sure to be just as salacious. Suit up the next Steve Kroft with his hidden camera and send him in.

Obama should express some of that self-righteous indignation he does so well and, considering the size and scope of the scandals involving ACORN's many branches and subsidiaries, he should appoint a special counsel.

If he doesn't do something, he'll soon lose control as Republican governors and prosecutors take the lead. If he does, some in ACORN's ranks will probably turn on him, (or others in his administration).

All in all, a pretty sticky wicket. But with the smell of blood in the water, it's better to get ahead of the story than be carried by it.

Which is why he needs to throw ACORN under the bus

Drew McKissick is a political strategist and former member of the Republican National Committee with over twenty years of experience in grassroots politics. He writes a regular column providing analysis and commentary on current events. His website is available at DrewMcKissick.com. You can follow him on Twitter @DrewMcKissick

Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager! Subscribe to Drew McKissick's RSS feed using any feed reader!

EasyPublish™ this article - publishers click here

More articles by Drew McKissick

Free Report!
Ten Essential Secrets Of Article Marketing ... Grab Your Free
Copy
Now:




We respect your privacy.


Need Content?
Regular Top Quality Content for your Blog, Ezine or Website ...
Delivered Direct,
For Free!

Click For Details



Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Business - General
Computers & Technology
Finance & Investment
Food & Drink
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Internet Marketing/Online Business
Legal
Pets & Animals
Politics & Government
Reference & Education
Religion & Faith
Self-Improvement/Motivation
Social
Sports & Recreation
Travel & Leisure
Writing & Speaking

More political articles:

  • Kyoto Protocol in the Limelight (Klaus H Hemsath)
    The Kyoto Protocol of 1997 is still the concept for agreeing on a more effective worldwide agreement on dealing with greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing energy consumption is expensive and will strangle economic activities. A new concept must assure that world economies will continue to prosper. Only strong economies can provide opportunities for growing populations. This article introduces such a new approach to climate control.

  • War - What Is It Good For? - Absolutely Everything (Howard Jacobs)
    War is a horrifying event. Unlike a natural disaster, it seems that reasonable people should have found a way to avoid it by now. However, as frightening and insane as war is, the idea of not going to war while mad men are committing atrocities is inexcusable. In the real world, mad men can't be reasoned with. It is the reasonable people who often have to act more like mad men in order to defeat them. That's a sad reality.

  • Jailed Father on Hunger Strike to Protest Denial of His Parental and Other Constitutional Rights (Shane Flait)
    Dr. Amir Sanjari, was divorce after a 17 year marriage. He's a UK Citizen who was originally invited to the United States to Stony Brook University, New York for a research position. Now he's destitute and on a hungar strike in jail to protest the unconstitutional denial of father' rights and more.

  • CERT Products (Eric Holm)
    Certified Emergency Response Teams (CERT's) help in emergency situations, evacuations, disaster situations, preparation for hurricanes, and numerous other calamities. All communities should have a trained and equiped Certified Emergency Response Team.

  • The Texas Constitution Verses the Vermont Constitution (James Holan)
    This article offers an indepth analysis of the Texas and Vermont constitutions, comparing and contrasting them. It offers a lot of information on their indivudal histories, politics, and purposes.

  • A scary story - the public option? (Peter Yellowlees)
    This article describes fear of change and argues that members of congress need to overcome this in order to be able to vote for health reform that includes a public option

  • Local Governments: How They Work (James Holan)
    This is an informative article about how local governments in the United States work. It follows closely to two examples, New York and Delaware.

  • Who Will Win in Copenhagen? (Klaus H Hemsath)
    U.S. Chamber of Commerce position is indefensible. Growing world economies are producing escalating greenhouse gas emissions. Severe global overheating will change climates dramatically. Rising sea levels, flooding, violent windstorms, and extensive droughts will destroy world economies and will cause economic collapse. World economies must agree on producing renewable energy supplies. Fossil fuel burning must and can be halted completely.

  • Imprecatory Prayer IS a Weapon and Mikey DOESN'T Like it! (Leah L Burton)
    Freedom of speech does not give license to call for death and/or harm to come to others...even those who claim to only be quoting the word of god from the Bible. This lawsuit is about drawing a line in the sand to procure legal protection from the practice of "imprecatory prayers" to incite violence.

We Automatically Distribute Articles
To Thousands Of Publishers And Web Sites:

Submit Article
All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributing authors and not necessarily those of this web site, or its owner, Takanomi Limited.
 
Copyright © 2009 Takanomi Ltd. Company no. 5629683. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Legal | Contact Information