Article Directory :: Politics & Government Articles

Never Underestimate How Much Credit Reformers Will Accept for a Vote

By Ed Bagley

Subscribe to Ed Bagley's RSS feed using any feed reader!

Republish: EasyPublish
Published: 20Jun2009
Word count: 653
Viewed: 110 time(s)
Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager!
Get Free Content For Your Site

Copyright © 2009 Ed Bagley

When I moved from the East Coast to the West Coast in 1973, credit card companies doing business in the State of Washington could not legally charge more than 12% interest on an account. That was because credit card interest rates were subject to the usury limits of the State of Washington; that was the law in every state.

In 1979, the U. S. Supreme Court justices that represented you and me ruled that the state of the lender, not of the borrower, had the sole power to legislate interest rate limits.

South Dakota then eliminated any usury limits, hoping to draw more businesses to its state. The credit card companies flocked to South Dakota and immediately began to increase their interest rates to what have now become unconscionable levels. Federal credit unions are currently limited to charging a maximum of 18% interest, but banks can charge whatever the market will bear.

Many banks currently charge 30% interest for certain accounts, and virtually all banks have default rates that soar to 30% when cardholders use their line of credit and then overcharge their limit, make a late payment, or miss their monthly payment. Credit card providers also have steep fines for any misstep a consumer may commit.

While no one is forcing consumers to apply for and use credit cards, credit card companies have routinely and willfully taken advantage of any consumer misfortune, such as losing their job or being hit with exorbitant hospital bills, to inflate interest rates.

The average credit card balance of many Americans is $13,000, either on one card or several cards. A 30% interest rate means the consumer has to pay more than $300 a month in interest alone without reducing the underlying $13,000 principal balance by a single cent.

The idea is to put consumers into a position where they have a legal obligation for the rest of their natural lives that they cannot possibly bring to a zero balance even if they stop using their credit card(s) and pay the interest only.

The recent legislation to help curb these abuses sounds better than it is. Yes, there are some restrictions but here is what the bill does not do:

It does not cap interest rates on credit cards, it just slows down the time when the rates can be implemented. Companies will still be able to charge interest rates of 30%, 40%, 50% or 100%, whatever the market will bear.

It does not explicitly cap credit card fees. Are your surprised? Don't be.

It does not take effect immediately, giving credit providers in many cases 9 months to raise rates and fees on current accounts. Do you really think they will not do so?

It does not limit interchange fees charged to businesses for credit card processing; these fees are passed on to the consumer.

In other words, the bill does not attempt to restrict the most important issues, such as capping the interest rates and fees.

It also does not prevent issuers from finding new fees to boost revenue. Use your card to withdraw money at another bank's ATM machine, and your credit card provider as well as the bank in question charges a fee. Look for these fees to rise dramatically. So how ridiculous can this get? How about cameras that record if you even look at an ATM machine but do not use it, then you are charged a fee for just thinking about using the machine.

While some regulation of credit card provider abuse is welcome, this current bill is more smoke and mirrors than substantive legislation. Why? Heck, I thought you would never ask.

Here's why: Credit card providers spread a lot of money around to get a majority of your congressmen to craft a bill that was more favorable to the credit card company than the consumer. Some people call this lobbying; others call it a convenient pay-for-vote system that continues to enrich congressmen and credit card companies at your expense.

Unemployed? Learn how to get the job you need. A FREE 6-Part Series on Email Resume Management can help. Get Valuable Information and Updates as well on Jobs, Careers, Promotions, Resumes, Cover Letters, Job Interviews, Hiring Practices, Online Hiring, and Career Fairs. Become part of my Personal Email List; subscribe for free at: http://www.edbagleyblog.com/JobsandCareers.html

Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager! Subscribe to Ed Bagley's RSS feed using any feed reader!

EasyPublish™ this article - publishers click here

More articles by Ed Bagley

Free Report!
Ten Essential Secrets Of Article Marketing ... Grab Your Free
Copy
Now:




We respect your privacy.


Need Content?
Regular Top Quality Content for your Blog, Ezine or Website ...
Delivered Direct,
For Free!

Click For Details



Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Business - General
Computers & Technology
Finance & Investment
Food & Drink
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Internet Marketing/Online Business
Legal
Pets & Animals
Politics & Government
Reference & Education
Religion & Faith
Self-Improvement/Motivation
Social
Sports & Recreation
Travel & Leisure
Writing & Speaking

More political articles:

  • CERT Products (Eric Holm)
    Certified Emergency Response Teams (CERT's) help in emergency situations, evacuations, disaster situations, preparation for hurricanes, and numerous other calamities. All communities should have a trained and equiped Certified Emergency Response Team.

  • The Texas Constitution Verses the Vermont Constitution (James Holan)
    This article offers an indepth analysis of the Texas and Vermont constitutions, comparing and contrasting them. It offers a lot of information on their indivudal histories, politics, and purposes.

  • A scary story - the public option? (Peter Yellowlees)
    This article describes fear of change and argues that members of congress need to overcome this in order to be able to vote for health reform that includes a public option

  • Local Governments: How They Work (James Holan)
    This is an informative article about how local governments in the United States work. It follows closely to two examples, New York and Delaware.

  • Who Will Win in Copenhagen? (Klaus H Hemsath)
    U.S. Chamber of Commerce position is indefensible. Growing world economies are producing escalating greenhouse gas emissions. Severe global overheating will change climates dramatically. Rising sea levels, flooding, violent windstorms, and extensive droughts will destroy world economies and will cause economic collapse. World economies must agree on producing renewable energy supplies. Fossil fuel burning must and can be halted completely.

  • Imprecatory Prayer IS a Weapon and Mikey DOESN'T Like it! (Leah L Burton)
    Freedom of speech does not give license to call for death and/or harm to come to others...even those who claim to only be quoting the word of god from the Bible. This lawsuit is about drawing a line in the sand to procure legal protection from the practice of "imprecatory prayers" to incite violence.

  • Right-wingers, conspiracies and racists, oh my! (Drew McKissick)
    When political times get tough for liberal Democrats in Washington, conservative conspiracies are the bogeymen of choice.

  • Deducting Your Seminar Expenses (Tom Wheelwright)
    This is an area of the tax law that is a prime example of how increasing your knowledge, can decrease your risk. In this case, it can decrease the risk of overpaying your taxes and decrease the risk of having to pay more tax (and penalties and interest) if you are audited.

  • Copenhagen Can Open New Era of Clean and Economical Energies (Klaus H Hemsath)
    Growing world economies are producing escalating greenhouse gas emissions. The Kyoto Protocol is ineffective in halting or reducing atmospheric carbon dioxide accumulation. Severe global overheating will change climates dramatically. Rising sea levels, flooding, violent windstorms, and extensive droughts will destroy world economies and will cause economic collapse. World governments must develop supplies of clean and economical energies.

  • Government Influence over Employment Practices illustrated with Emilio Botin Abbey Santander price (Simon King)
    Some of the ways in which the UK government influences employment practices are illustrated with the high-profile case Chagger v Abbey National plc & Hopkins (2006), in which the Employment Tribunal made a finding of unlawful race discrimination and ordered Emilio Botin Abbey Santander to pay Mr Chagger the record-breaking compensation of £2.8 million to cover his loss.

We Automatically Distribute Articles
To Thousands Of Publishers And Web Sites:

Submit Article
All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributing authors and not necessarily those of this web site, or its owner, Takanomi Limited.
 
Copyright © 2009 Takanomi Ltd. Company no. 5629683. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Legal | Contact Information